
Editor in Chief
Andika, S.E., M.M
Universitas Janabadra, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Scopus ID: 58299752500
View MoreThe publication ethics of Jurnal Sinergi Inovasi dan Masyarakat (JSIM) are based on the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors. This statement outlines the ethical responsibilities of editors, reviewers, authors, and the publisher to ensure integrity, transparency, and accountability in scholarly publishing.
The Editor-in-Chief is responsible for deciding which submitted manuscripts should be published. Decisions are based on the manuscript’s academic merit, originality, clarity, relevance to the journal’s scope, and reviewers’ recommendations. Editors may consult other editorial board members or reviewers in making decisions and must comply with legal requirements regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism.
Editors evaluate manuscripts solely on their intellectual content without discrimination based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Editors and editorial staff must not disclose any information about submitted manuscripts to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor’s own research without the author’s explicit written consent. Editors must recuse themselves from handling manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest.
Peer review assists editors in making publication decisions and helps authors improve the quality of their manuscripts through constructive feedback.
Reviewers who feel unqualified to review a manuscript or are unable to provide a timely review should notify the editor promptly and withdraw from the review process.
Manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents and must not be shared or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Reviews must be conducted objectively and supported by clear arguments. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate.
Reviewers should identify relevant published works not cited by the authors and inform the editor of any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under review and other published works known to them.
Privileged information obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers must decline to review manuscripts where conflicts of interest exist.
Authors must present an accurate account of the work performed and provide sufficient detail and references to allow replication. Fabrication, falsification, or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
Authors must ensure that their work is entirely original. Any use of others’ work or words must be properly cited. All manuscripts are subject to plagiarism screening.
Authors should not submit the same manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously or publish substantially similar research in multiple journals. Such practices are considered unethical.
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have influenced their research and community service activities.
Authorship should be limited to individuals who have made significant contributions to the conception, design, implementation, or interpretation of the reported work. All co-authors must approve the final version of the manuscript and agree to its submission. Contributors who do not meet authorship criteria should be acknowledged appropriately.
Authors must disclose any financial or other conflicts of interest that may influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of funding must be clearly stated.
If authors discover significant errors or inaccuracies in their published work, they must promptly notify the editor and cooperate to correct or retract the article.
JSIM is committed to handling allegations of research misconduct, plagiarism, citation manipulation, data fabrication, and unethical community engagement practices according to COPE flowcharts and best practice standards. Corrections, retractions, or expressions of concern will be issued when necessary to maintain academic integrity.
